Near-Optimal Label Complexity for Active Huber Regression
We resolve, up to logarithmic factors, the Huber dimension-dependence question posed by Musco, Musco, Woodruff, and Yasuda [14], reducing the rank exponent from \(4-2\sqrt2\) to one. We study fixed-design active regression in the exact-real label-query model: the feature matrix \(A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times d}\) is known, while an arbitrary response vector is accessible only through coordinate queries. For \(r=\operatorname{rank}(A)\), our randomized nonadaptive algorithm queries \(\min\{n,\widetilde O(r/\varepsilon^2)\}\) labels and, with probability at least \(0.99\), returns a \((1+\varepsilon)\)-approximation to the square root of the empirical Huber loss. All query locations are fixed before any label is read. For every admissible pool size and rank, and \(0<\varepsilon\leq1/800\), we construct a fixed rank-\(r\) design on which every adaptive randomized algorithm with the same worst-case guarantee needs \(\Omega(\min\{n,r/\varepsilon^2\})\) labels in worst-case expectation. Thus label complexity is jointly optimal in pool size, rank, and accuracy up to logarithmic factors in this range. The guarantee requires no distributional or noise assumptions and includes zero-optimum instances. The key ingredient is a centered affine transfer lemma: design-only multiscale scores preserve the objective increments needed to locate the minimizer after an independent constant-factor pilot. This overcomes the hidden-label dependence of standard affine sparsification and turns near-linear design sparsification into a near-optimal active algorithm.